My organs donation is unacceptable وهبة اعضاء جسمى غير مقبوله

Laws had been enacted by scrolling secretly in the Egyptian parliament in 1962 and been modified in 2003, which does not give it legitimacy, like many of the laws that serve individuals or groups as a bribe or to please others in an intention of wining the support of a particular class or isolation of another class of the Egyptian society means that the majority of the Egyptian parliament does not express and represent the majority of the Egyptian society.
 we understand what distinguishes and gives legitimacy to a law which is endorsed by the majority of the parliament only expresses what the government wanted to do,this majority which won the elections by forging votes and some other of them by bribes and buying the votes of the very poor people whereas some of them too won by bullying .This does not mean the majority of people, but if it really does,It will express and represnt  the majority of the Egyptian society.However,the majority in the parliament represents the ruler  and his party to impose on the people's views and the laws approved by a majority in parliament won the fraud and to circumvent the laws and therefore.
 I believe that Egyptian People's Assembly does not represent the Egyptians and not expressing their opinions and do not defend their rights, but rather pass laws that allow and provide the appropriate atmosphere for the ruling party with all the features that are keeping it in power as long as possible. of these laws in 1962 law permit the taking of organs of the body of the deceased without his permission before his death or permission of his family after his death, after the amendment to this law in 2003 and this is not considered a law, but rather is stealing  organs of the dead and is a crime not a law and contrary to international law and regulations .
http://translate.google.com.eg/translate?hl=ar&langpair=en%7Car&u=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornea
القرنية هي شفافة الجزء الأمامي من العين الذي يغطي القزحية ، تلميذ ، و الغرفة الأمامية . Together with the lens , the cornea refracts light, accounting for approximately two-thirds of the eye's total optical power . [ 1 ] [ 2 ] In humans, the refractive power of the cornea is approximately 43 dioptres . [ 3 ] While the cornea contributes most of the eye's focusing power, its focus is fixed. جنبا إلى جنب مع العدسة ، القرنية ينكسر الضوء ، وهو ما يمثل الثلثين تقريبا من العين اجمالي
 At a meeting on May 26, 2010 Ministry of Health has this The meeting, which was a press conference designed to respond to provoke a young Egyptian who his wife died in an accident and when he went to the hospital to receive the objects, of course, according to the law  the deceased body delivers to one of the security  accompanied by a relative of the deceased and therefore took the body . then,they  went to another hospital to receive the permission for burial  when they found that the hospital, the latter did not accept to receive the body because there the cornea  had been extracted  and  placed with glass ones . therefore, the husband of the deceased and those with him went to the hospital first and during the debate which was included with thug from by the officials of the hospital whrere he was told at the end after several contacts that there is a law that allows them to remove the cornea of the deceased in the accident or the deceased who has no relatives , as evidenced by or convicts to be sentenced to death ,The press conference was also believed that  Minister of Health and his accompanions took it for a legal response, and though nothing had happened and this is another way to impose the views and laws over the Egyptian People in a thug manner .Some of people commented on this conference and the law on tv channels and publics opinion ,said that we in this case of permanent fatigue during our lifetime  and be insulted when departing as  violation of the sanctity of the dead  is not acceptable. finally, enacted  law that was passed in 2003  conceded that the person who did not forbide giving or donating his organs is considered agreed to offer and donate his organs after his death..what is funny every Egyptian citizen including Mubarak did not sign any paper to fobide donating his organs and also the law does not offer the procedure of doing such formalities . this is a  disregard of other people's minds and using bully in dealing with the important things also is uncivilized. So,  according to the above we get the following conclusion
The sanctity of the dead is sanctified by all religions and man-made laws in the whole world and so  enacting such a law must be in the form and shape of the  civilizational manner
this law must be abolished and on its designated date until other legislation, more civilized and respect for the sanctity and desecration of the dead commensurate with religions and international charters
It is necessary for the Egyptian government to recognize that such an action is not a law and criminality, and supersede community participates in the enactment of laws affecting them and care about and should not be passed .Accountable Must be held to whom carried out this criminal act .Appropriate compensation for those affected by this law

لقد تم سن قانون عن طريق التمرير و فى الخفاء مما لا يعطيه الشرعيه مثله مثل الكثير من القوانين التى تخدم افراد او مجموعات كرشوة او ارضاء لهم و الهدف منها كسب تاييد فئه معينه او عزل فئه اخرى من فئات المجتمع . فاهم ما يميز و يعطى الشرعيه لاى قانون هو موافقه الاغلبيه عليه و ليس معنى اغلبية الشعب الا اذا كان فعلا اغلبيه مجلس الشعب تمثل الشعب و لا تمثل الحاكم و حزبه لفرض على الشعب اراء و قوانين يوافق عليها اغلبيه فى مجلس الشعب فازت بالتزوير و التحايل على القوانين و بالتالى فارى ان مجلس الشعب المصرى لا يمثل المصريين و لا يعبر عن ارائهم و لا يدافع عن حقوقهم و انما يمرر القوانين التى تسمح و توفر المناخ المناسب لحصول الحزب الحاكم على كافة المميزات التى تبقيه فى السلطه اطول فترة ممكنه.من تلك القوانين عام 1962 قانون يسمح باخذ اعضاء من جسم المتوفى دون اذنه قبل وفاته او اذن ذويه بعد وفاته وبعد تعديل هذا القانون عام 2003 و هذا لا يعد قانون و انما يعد سرقه اعضاء الموتى و هى جريمه و مخالف للقوانين الدوليه و فى اجتماع يوم 26 مايو 2010 لوزارة الصحه قام هذا الاجتماع و الذى كان بمثابه مؤتمر صحفى الهدف منه الرد على ما اثارة شاب مصرى توفت زوجته فى حادث و عندما ذهب الى المستشفى ليتسلم الجسمان بالطبع ووفقا للقانون يتسلم الجسمان احد رجال الامن و يرافقه قريب المتوفى و بالتالى اخذوا الجسمان ثم ذهبوا الى مستشفى اخر ليتسلموا تصريحا بالدفن زو اذا بنا نجد المستشفى الاخير لم يرضى ان يتسلم الجثه لانه تم انتزاع قرنيتيها ووجود مكانها اخرى زجاج و بالتالى قام زوج المتوفاه و من معه بالذهاب الى المستشفى الاول و اذا بنقاش يصل الى حد البلطجه من مسؤلى المستشفى و بالتالى قيل له فى النهايه بعد عدة اتصالات ان هناك قانون يسمح لهم بنزع القرنيه من المتوفى فى حادث او المتوفى و ليس له احد يستدل عليه او المحكوم عليهم بالاعدامو كان المؤتمر الصحفى كما يعتقد وزير الصحه و من رافقوه بمثابة الرد القانونى و كان شيئا لم يكن و هذا اسلوب اخر لفرض الاراء و القوانين على الشعب المصرى بطريقة البلطجه و من الناس من علق على ذلك و قال اننا فى حالة ارهاق دائم و اعياء و اهانه فى مشوا رحياتنا و لكن ان نهان و نقطع و تنتهك حرمات الموتى امر غير مقبول و اخيرا القانون الذى تم تشريعه و تمريره عام 2003 يقر ان الشخص الذى لم يتقدم بعدم المساس باعضائه يعتبر موافق على اخذ اعضاءه فور مماته و هذا استخفاف اخر بعقول الناس و اسلب بلطجى فى التعامل مع الامور الهامه و غير حضارى.و مما سبق نصل الى النتائج التاليه

ان حرمة الموتى امر قدسه كل الاديان و التشريعات الوضعيه فى العالم باسره و كى يتم سن قانون كهذا لابد ان يكون فى صورة و شكل ادمى و حضارى
لابد من الغاء هذا القانون و العمل به من تاريخه لحين تشريع اخر اكثر حضاريه و احتراما لقدسيه و حرمات الموتى يتناسب مع الاديان و المواثيق الدوليه
لابد للحكومه المصريه ان تعترف بان عمل كهذا يعتبر اجراما و ليس قانونا و يجبان يشارك المجتمع فى سن القوانين التى تخصه و تهمه و لا يجب تمريرها  يجب محاسبه من قام بهذا العمل الاجرامى التعويض المناسب للمتضررين من هذا القانون