My organs donation is unacceptable وهبة اعضاء جسمى غير مقبوله

Laws had been enacted by scrolling secretly in the Egyptian parliament in 1962 and been modified in 2003, which does not give it legitimacy, like many of the laws that serve individuals or groups as a bribe or to please others in an intention of wining the support of a particular class or isolation of another class of the Egyptian society means that the majority of the Egyptian parliament does not express and represent the majority of the Egyptian society.
 we understand what distinguishes and gives legitimacy to a law which is endorsed by the majority of the parliament only expresses what the government wanted to do,this majority which won the elections by forging votes and some other of them by bribes and buying the votes of the very poor people whereas some of them too won by bullying .This does not mean the majority of people, but if it really does,It will express and represnt  the majority of the Egyptian society.However,the majority in the parliament represents the ruler  and his party to impose on the people's views and the laws approved by a majority in parliament won the fraud and to circumvent the laws and therefore.
 I believe that Egyptian People's Assembly does not represent the Egyptians and not expressing their opinions and do not defend their rights, but rather pass laws that allow and provide the appropriate atmosphere for the ruling party with all the features that are keeping it in power as long as possible. of these laws in 1962 law permit the taking of organs of the body of the deceased without his permission before his death or permission of his family after his death, after the amendment to this law in 2003 and this is not considered a law, but rather is stealing  organs of the dead and is a crime not a law and contrary to international law and regulations .
http://translate.google.com.eg/translate?hl=ar&langpair=en%7Car&u=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornea
القرنية هي شفافة الجزء الأمامي من العين الذي يغطي القزحية ، تلميذ ، و الغرفة الأمامية . Together with the lens , the cornea refracts light, accounting for approximately two-thirds of the eye's total optical power . [ 1 ] [ 2 ] In humans, the refractive power of the cornea is approximately 43 dioptres . [ 3 ] While the cornea contributes most of the eye's focusing power, its focus is fixed. جنبا إلى جنب مع العدسة ، القرنية ينكسر الضوء ، وهو ما يمثل الثلثين تقريبا من العين اجمالي
 At a meeting on May 26, 2010 Ministry of Health has this The meeting, which was a press conference designed to respond to provoke a young Egyptian who his wife died in an accident and when he went to the hospital to receive the objects, of course, according to the law  the deceased body delivers to one of the security  accompanied by a relative of the deceased and therefore took the body . then,they  went to another hospital to receive the permission for burial  when they found that the hospital, the latter did not accept to receive the body because there the cornea  had been extracted  and  placed with glass ones . therefore, the husband of the deceased and those with him went to the hospital first and during the debate which was included with thug from by the officials of the hospital whrere he was told at the end after several contacts that there is a law that allows them to remove the cornea of the deceased in the accident or the deceased who has no relatives , as evidenced by or convicts to be sentenced to death ,The press conference was also believed that  Minister of Health and his accompanions took it for a legal response, and though nothing had happened and this is another way to impose the views and laws over the Egyptian People in a thug manner .Some of people commented on this conference and the law on tv channels and publics opinion ,said that we in this case of permanent fatigue during our lifetime  and be insulted when departing as  violation of the sanctity of the dead  is not acceptable. finally, enacted  law that was passed in 2003  conceded that the person who did not forbide giving or donating his organs is considered agreed to offer and donate his organs after his death..what is funny every Egyptian citizen including Mubarak did not sign any paper to fobide donating his organs and also the law does not offer the procedure of doing such formalities . this is a  disregard of other people's minds and using bully in dealing with the important things also is uncivilized. So,  according to the above we get the following conclusion
The sanctity of the dead is sanctified by all religions and man-made laws in the whole world and so  enacting such a law must be in the form and shape of the  civilizational manner
this law must be abolished and on its designated date until other legislation, more civilized and respect for the sanctity and desecration of the dead commensurate with religions and international charters
It is necessary for the Egyptian government to recognize that such an action is not a law and criminality, and supersede community participates in the enactment of laws affecting them and care about and should not be passed .Accountable Must be held to whom carried out this criminal act .Appropriate compensation for those affected by this law

لقد تم سن قانون عن طريق التمرير و فى الخفاء مما لا يعطيه الشرعيه مثله مثل الكثير من القوانين التى تخدم افراد او مجموعات كرشوة او ارضاء لهم و الهدف منها كسب تاييد فئه معينه او عزل فئه اخرى من فئات المجتمع . فاهم ما يميز و يعطى الشرعيه لاى قانون هو موافقه الاغلبيه عليه و ليس معنى اغلبية الشعب الا اذا كان فعلا اغلبيه مجلس الشعب تمثل الشعب و لا تمثل الحاكم و حزبه لفرض على الشعب اراء و قوانين يوافق عليها اغلبيه فى مجلس الشعب فازت بالتزوير و التحايل على القوانين و بالتالى فارى ان مجلس الشعب المصرى لا يمثل المصريين و لا يعبر عن ارائهم و لا يدافع عن حقوقهم و انما يمرر القوانين التى تسمح و توفر المناخ المناسب لحصول الحزب الحاكم على كافة المميزات التى تبقيه فى السلطه اطول فترة ممكنه.من تلك القوانين عام 1962 قانون يسمح باخذ اعضاء من جسم المتوفى دون اذنه قبل وفاته او اذن ذويه بعد وفاته وبعد تعديل هذا القانون عام 2003 و هذا لا يعد قانون و انما يعد سرقه اعضاء الموتى و هى جريمه و مخالف للقوانين الدوليه و فى اجتماع يوم 26 مايو 2010 لوزارة الصحه قام هذا الاجتماع و الذى كان بمثابه مؤتمر صحفى الهدف منه الرد على ما اثارة شاب مصرى توفت زوجته فى حادث و عندما ذهب الى المستشفى ليتسلم الجسمان بالطبع ووفقا للقانون يتسلم الجسمان احد رجال الامن و يرافقه قريب المتوفى و بالتالى اخذوا الجسمان ثم ذهبوا الى مستشفى اخر ليتسلموا تصريحا بالدفن زو اذا بنا نجد المستشفى الاخير لم يرضى ان يتسلم الجثه لانه تم انتزاع قرنيتيها ووجود مكانها اخرى زجاج و بالتالى قام زوج المتوفاه و من معه بالذهاب الى المستشفى الاول و اذا بنقاش يصل الى حد البلطجه من مسؤلى المستشفى و بالتالى قيل له فى النهايه بعد عدة اتصالات ان هناك قانون يسمح لهم بنزع القرنيه من المتوفى فى حادث او المتوفى و ليس له احد يستدل عليه او المحكوم عليهم بالاعدامو كان المؤتمر الصحفى كما يعتقد وزير الصحه و من رافقوه بمثابة الرد القانونى و كان شيئا لم يكن و هذا اسلوب اخر لفرض الاراء و القوانين على الشعب المصرى بطريقة البلطجه و من الناس من علق على ذلك و قال اننا فى حالة ارهاق دائم و اعياء و اهانه فى مشوا رحياتنا و لكن ان نهان و نقطع و تنتهك حرمات الموتى امر غير مقبول و اخيرا القانون الذى تم تشريعه و تمريره عام 2003 يقر ان الشخص الذى لم يتقدم بعدم المساس باعضائه يعتبر موافق على اخذ اعضاءه فور مماته و هذا استخفاف اخر بعقول الناس و اسلب بلطجى فى التعامل مع الامور الهامه و غير حضارى.و مما سبق نصل الى النتائج التاليه

ان حرمة الموتى امر قدسه كل الاديان و التشريعات الوضعيه فى العالم باسره و كى يتم سن قانون كهذا لابد ان يكون فى صورة و شكل ادمى و حضارى
لابد من الغاء هذا القانون و العمل به من تاريخه لحين تشريع اخر اكثر حضاريه و احتراما لقدسيه و حرمات الموتى يتناسب مع الاديان و المواثيق الدوليه
لابد للحكومه المصريه ان تعترف بان عمل كهذا يعتبر اجراما و ليس قانونا و يجبان يشارك المجتمع فى سن القوانين التى تخصه و تهمه و لا يجب تمريرها  يجب محاسبه من قام بهذا العمل الاجرامى التعويض المناسب للمتضررين من هذا القانون

Workrs claiming their right are not to be beaten! لا يمكن ضرب العمال المطالبين بحقوقهم

In accordance with the news of Al Youm7 News which was nearly one of the resources of documenting the aggressition assault ,repression and oppression by the security Egyptian police to the worker when the police confisicated all video tapes with the media people so as to complete and continue their chocking to the democracy and sentence human rights to death.
 Aisha Abdel Hady, Femal Minister of Manpower and Immigration said, the break-up company workers (Amoncio), after the success of the Committee to set up by the Ministry of Manpower with the participation of representatives from each of Banque Misr and the General Labor Union in spinning and weaving, and trade-union committee of employees in (Amoncio) to reach an agreement to settle the rights of workers of the company.
The minister said,It would be launched within the next few days to coordinate with all stakeholders and the General Federation of Trade Unions of Egypt to take all necessary steps to implement the agreement and to safeguard the rights of workers, and it will work to provide alternative employment opportunities a worker out on the early retirement of the company after its liquidation.This occured weeks ago.

The company workers (Amoncio) have started their sit-in by more than 3 weeks before the Shoura Council

after all discussions and decissions reached by the labour committee and the minister with the bank ,the workers were said to take 106 million pound .workers were waiting another dicission and the final one by the committee in the Egyptian parliament where they were threatened to accept only 50 million pound and then the police security began to beat them all as shown in the pictures.

What happened with the workers of Amncio and beating as a severe punshment for claiming their rights and prevent them from the right to protest outside parliament to demand their legal and financial  rights, and after the arrival of the Minister of  Manpower to a solutions and discussed with the whole parts of the problem in settlement of accounts and Workers Syndicate of workers in the parliament after notifying the workers of their financial allocation of a given according to law 106 million Egyptian pounds and then reversed, after the debate between those who were associated for a solution for the workers problems then soon after used bad manners , thug , inappropriate and inhumane by a telephone by the General Labor Union   when contacted by one of the workers that they will get only 50 million Egyptian pounds and any objection would be met by beating them with shoes(beating someone with a shoes is an insult even if a threat and very humilating in our culture to the extent that someone can be stapped ,is better for him to live with such an insult) ... this is a violation of all international laws and the Egyptian constitution and is an affront to the world's workers and workers in a humiliating way and Egypt to discuss with the people who have rights and then deny their rights and then  the role of security  comes to beat them and prevent them from demonstrating, is a way of bullying by the Egyptian government in conjunction with the Egyptian security and abuse of power and retreat of democracy and an attempt to impose their views usurped the rights of workers.

We blame and criticise  the Egyptian Government in its treatment of matters with the protesters demanding the rights that have been agreed upon in accordance with the law. a lack of understanding of decent and civilized actions to handle such issues.
We also draw criticism of the way of violence and repression and to try to close all the legal channels for workers to express their legitimate rights and criticism of the Egyptian government's attempt to deprive these workers of their legal rights and financial legitimacy and their acceptance despite the lowest they can get .we recommend some negotiations and a proper way to handle such issues

The Egyptian government's attempt to deceive the international community and the repression of the Egyptian society by preventing them from demonstrating in view of the recently witnessed large demonstrations however the government  functioned on mismanagement and randomized decision-making at all levels with such issues

وفقا للاخبار التى نطالعها فى جرائد عديدة و منها اليوم السابع كما ان اليوم السابع تعتبر من اهم الصحف التى نشرت الصور الخاصه بالاعتداء على عمال شركة امنسيتو

حيث ان وزيرة القوى العامله فى المصرى اليوم و العديد من الصحف ظهرت و هى توعد العمال  بوضح حلو قريبا و بعد التقاءها بالبنك و نقابة العمال و ادراة الشركه و اعضاء البرلمان و قد قاموا وفقا للحسابات بوعد العمال بحصولهم على 106 مليون جنيه مصرى ليأتى فى اجتماعهم الاخير فى البرلمان حين قام نقيب العمال بالاتصال بهم و تهديدهم و اهانتهم بانهم سوف يحصلوا على 50 مليون جنيه فقط لتسويه كل امورهم و منهم المتقاعد عن المعاش المبكر و الا ....بالجزمه ..

ان ما حدث مع عمال امنسيتو و ضربهم و منعهم من حق الاحتجاج امام مجلس الشعب فى المطالبه بحقوقهم القانونيه و الماليه و بعد وصول وزيرة الشئون الاجتماعيه و القوى العامله لحلول و مناقشتها مع البنك الذى اناب عن الشركه فى تسوية حسابات العمال و نقيب العمال وفى مجلس الشعب بعد اخطار العمال فى حقوقهم الماليه بتوزيع معين وفقا للقانون 106 مليون جنيه مصرى ثم العدول عن ذلك بعد النقاش الذى دار بين هؤلاء فى مجلس الشعب ثم اخطار العمال بطريقة البلطجه و غير لائقة و غير ادميه من خلال الهاتف حينما اتصل بهم نقيب العمال بانهم سوف يحصلون على فقط 50 مليون جنيه مصرى و اى معارضه سوف يتم ضربهم بالحذاء ...فهذا امر يخالف كل القوانين الدوليه و الدستور المصرى و يعد اهانه لعمال العالم و عمال مصر و طريقه مهينه للنقاش مع اصحاب حق و ياتى بعد ذلك دور الامن بضربهم و منعهم من التظاهر امام البرلمان فى القاهرة يعد اسلوبا من اساليب البلطجه للحكومه المصريه بالاشتراك مع الامن المصرى و استغلال السلطه و تراجع للديموقراطيه و محاولة فرض الراى المغتصب لحقوق العمال

و بناء على ماسبق نوجه اللوم و النقد للحكومه المصريه فى طريقة تناولها للامور مع المتظاهرين المطالبين بحقوقهم التى تم الاتفاق عليها وفقا للقانون عدم التفاهم اللائق والحضارى معهم

كما اننا نوجه النقد لطريقه العنف و القمع و محاولة سد كل القنوات الشرعيه للعمال للتعبير عن حقوقهم المشروعه

و النقد لمحاولة الحكومه المصريه من حرمان هؤلاء العمال من حقوقهم القانونيه و الشرعيه و الماليه رغم قبولهم باقل ما يمكن الحصول عليه بعض مفاوضات و ايام احتجاج طالت بهم على مدى شهر تقريبا

محاوله الحكومه المصريه خداع المجتمع الدولى و قمع المجتمع المصرى بمنعهم من التظاهر نظرا لما تشهده الاونه الاخيرة من كثرة المظاهرات و الداله على سوء الادارة و عشوائيه اتخاذ القرارات على كافة المستويات